
|
|
excerpts from
MEN'S CLOTHING - 1900-1910
written and illustrated by Pepper Hume
|
Within the general prosperity of the times, a man’s home was his castle,
no matter how modest, and he was king, no matter what. Yet his
clothing proclaimed his station in life. The poor laborer wore sturdy,
dark clothes that seldom got washed (forget ironed!) because he had to
work in them at least six days a week. Protection from the cold, from
the dirt, from nakedness were genuine needs.
The man without at least a Sunday-go-to-meetin’ suit, one decent dress shirt, and a collar was surely a poor man. Or he lived so far away from a church or other civilizing institutions, he didn’t need it. He was still poor, in another sense. The leisured gentleman could afford to care about cut, fit, color, and fine fabrics. Dandies and swells could obsess over the perfect knot of a tie, the freshness of a linen collar. There were rules for appropriate dress for every occasion. Gentlemen still dressed differently for dinner or evening than for morning or afternoon. In between, men worked for a living at various economic levels. Tradesmen - the iceman, the farmer, the factory hand - dressed properly on Sunday and as well as their work permitted on weekdays. Professionals - teachers, barbers, clerks - and college men wore suits, starched shirts, white collars, and ties every day to show they worked with their minds, if also with their hands. Nonetheless, the sewing machine was fast eroding the age-old class distinctions in clothing. Ready-made clothes of quite serviceable quality were available in haberdasheries, department stores and mail order catalogues. The only way one could distinguish the average gent from his superior was by the finer quality of the latter’s garments. Average gents could not afford silk, except in ties, nor custom tailoring. They probably had to wear the same suit every day to work and would be lucky to have a second Sunday suit. Successful gents would have a summer weight suit and perhaps a blazer and white pants for summer holiday use. Meanwhile, as wide-spread prosperity provided more men with spare time and money, interest in casual activities and sports burgeoned, which in turn led to the demand for more comfortable clothes. Neither man nor boy went out in public without a hat or cap. He might be in shirt sleeves, an unbuttoned vest, or wearing a butcher’s apron over his suit, but he still wore his hat. Western movies do not exaggerate when a man goes out to face an enemy wearing only his long underwear, boots, gun belt, and HAT. For this decade we will dress:
|
||
|
|
||
|
He might have a separate full-length bath robe in similar fabric, if not
Turkish toweling, as terry was called. It had an attached hood and a cord
belt.
|
![]() |
|
|
The older the man, the more mustache he might wear, reminiscent of his own
youth, up to the handlebar (with lengthened tips waxed to curl up like a
bicycle handlebar), or walrus (full and long enough to cover the upper lip
if not the whole mouth), along with the muttonchops (sideburns that
covered the sides of the face down to the jaw, shaped like a chop).
|
![]() |
|
|
Half hose could be entirely woven lace or stripes (horizontal or
vertical), or in an allover pattern of tiny figures. Some were only
clocked, meaning they were solid color with a single design woven or
embroidered on the sides. Older, more dignified gentlemen eschewed the
brighter colors and patterns but succumbed to discreet stripes, allover
patterns and clocks. Wool half hose were a necessity in cold weather.
Despite their elastic knit tops, half hose needed help to stay up smoothly. Hence the man’s garter or suspender, a loop of half-inch wide elastic woven in rich colored stripes that hooked around the leg just below the knee. The hose supporter suspended from a ring in front. This device consisted of a button which one placed behind the hose, and a shaped loop that hooked around the neck of the button from the front, locking the hose between.
|
![]() |
|
|
Bow ties continued to be acceptable for street wear. Both street and
formal versions were available as band bows, pre-tied on a narrow band and
hooked in the back. Bow ties offered greater option in fabric choices. For
summer they could be cottons such as Chelsea cloth, percale or Madras.
Plaids and stripes could run straight or on the bias (diagonal).
Old-fashioned gentlemen could choose narrow string ties still called
plantation or planter’s ties, which were tied in a bow with long tails.
They usually preferred to tie their own, but a bow tie with dumbbell
shaped ends reduced bulk at the knot.
|
![]() |
|
|
At the start of the 20th century, all men’s shoes had sharply
pointed toes which softened over the first decade to a rounded toe. They
were black except for very special exceptions. High-top, lace-up shoes
continued to be worn in winter. Available in an assortment of leathers -
patent kid with a kangaroo top, box calf which had a pebbly surface and
was nearly waterproof, or all vici kid. Shoes were also made of beaver
felt. Most men’s shoes had a row of perforations across the toe. Some had
perforations along the vamp seam and alongside the grommets. Lacing
grommets were limited to five or six pairs covering the instep. From there
to the top, the lacing wrapped on four pairs of hooks, or three pairs of
hooks and a final pair of grommets.
|
![]() |
|
|
The main character of men’s coats in this first decade was loose and
longish with padded shoulders. Except for formal occasions, the sack coat,
already worn by workers and children for at least a hundred and fifty
years, finally became standard for all menswear, as it has remained ever
since. All men’s suit and sport coats through the rest of the 20th
century are sack coats. The most common sack coat had modest lapels
buttoned quite high. The four-button, round-cut sack could button
completely or curve apart just above the waist like a one-button cutaway.
The slightly longer, square-cut, single breasted sack with square bottom
corners could suggest a more conservative personality. The double
breasted version of both styles had three pairs of buttons.
|
![]() |
|
|
Derbies, or stiff hats, also called bowlers, had hard, bowl-round crowns
and hard, curled up brims approximately two inches wide. Usually black,
they could be brown or gray.
|
|
|
|
Daytime formal occasions like weddings, fetes, opening day at Ascot,
required a "morning" ensemble already hidebound in a tradition that is
still with us a hundred years later. A wing collar and grey-striped
puff scarf finished a largely hidden, stiff, boiled shirt. The vest,
usually grey broadcloth, could be more decorative, in pale colored pique,
corded silk, striped or checked cashmere. A truly traditional gentleman
might wear a double breasted vest with rolled collars. Trousers were
dark grey-striped although some slight variation was acceptable with solid
grey pants. The front edges of the three button, black broadcloth
cutaway coat curved back below the waist seam, to above knee-length at the
sides and back, still center split. Black Oxford shoes and grey
spats, a grey or black top hat and grey gloves completed morning dress.
|
![]() |
|
|
Complete fur coats were popular in bitter climates with men who could
afford them. Types of fur ran from smooth, dense, and glossy like brown or
black calfskin, black seal, otter, or imitation otter (actually beaver or
muskrat) to long haired black bear, black Russian buffalo, raccoon, to
curly astrakhan. Their large shawl collars were often a contrasting fur
like otter. Other variations included otter cuffs or a hood. Fur coats
usually had slanted ulster pockets, quilted linings, and waterproof duck
interlining. Incidentally, the English preferred their fur as a lining
inside an ordinary ulster of Scottish tweed or Irish frieze, while the
French and Americans wore fur lavishly on the outside.
Possibly the most extravagant of all was the Club, a beaver coat lined with mink. All that pelt could make a coat weigh more than twelve pounds!
|
|
|
|
Carpenter apron
overalls, precursor to bib overalls, rose like a shop apron in front and
were held up with straps over the shoulders. They buttoned at both sides
and had pockets front and back plus a tool pocket or two. They were denim
in blue or stripes of grey and black. Painters and paper-hangers wore
apron or regular overalls in white duck. Working men’s jackets were
usually denim or corduroy sack coats, cut boxier than suit coats and
sturdily stitched. They could be buttoned all the way to the collar like a
shirt. Surprise! Not all cowboys wore Levis. Most actually wore hard-wearing, heavy wool pants in stripes or checks, which they called California pants. Work pants required strong suspenders, which provided one opportunity for bright color in an otherwise dull wardrobe.
|
![]() |
|
|
Men in the west who worked cattle wore leather chaps to protect their legs
on horseback. Angoras or woolies, more popular in the colder northwest,
were made from sheepskin with the wool left on. Shotgun chaps were
straight- legged like mountain men’s leggings. Wing chaps extended in a
flap at the sides and were often worn loose from the knee down.
Chaps were made as two separate legs which buckled together in back and
tied with leather strips in front. They wrapped around the inner leg to
the back. Straps continued around to snap hook to rings behind the front.
|
![]() |
|
|
Standard winter and rain coat styles needed some wind-proofing
modification for motoring. Motoring coats were double breasted to brave
the frontal attack and long enough to cover knees and more while seated.
Cuffs were closed down by straps. Collars, deep enough to turn up over the
ears, were often fur on heavier coats.
There was still that piercing wind; leather was the answer. It was windproof and cleanable, and not nearly so heavy and bulky. All-leather coats appeared in far less voluminous cut with storm collars and cuffs. Leather also made excellent detachable linings for cloth coats, soft and light chamois being preferred. Unfortunately, all that windproofing worked both ways. With no ventilation, one’s body moisture soon rendered one’s clothing damp and disgusting inside one’s fine windproof leather coat. |
|
|
|
|
|
Send mail with questions or comments about this web
site to: Pepper Hume
Copyright © 2003 DCWORX All rights reserved.
Last modified: March 27, 2004 |